Living in such a visual world, it is
important to understand semiotics, as Chandler suggests, ‘Living in a world of increasingly visual signs,
we need to learn that even the most realistic signs are not what they appear to
be’ (Chandler, 2002, p.11.) So instead of studying it in a context that bores
me (most of the books on it do just this), I am going to apply semiotics to film.
Peirce, one of the theorists who came up with the idea of semiotics (along with
Saussure), stated that ‘Nothing is a sign unless it is interpreted as a sign’
(Peirce, 1931-58, P.172). If what Peirce
suggests is true then the science behind interpreting meaning in film, is all to do with the,
oh so confusing, theory of semiotics. So far I can just about grasp the concept
of the signifier
and the signified
combining together to create the sign. Yet I think its necessary to relate this
model to a film in order to really understand what it means. As an audience we
can interpret meanings from the smallest, most insignificant prop in a film, even if it was not
what the director intended. Which
to me suggests that all the elements combined to create a film, such as: cinematography, lighting and
mise-en-scene, could each be described as signifiers. For example, in Wes Anderson’s The Royal Tenenbaums (2001), almost
every scene has a little something that can be picked apart and interpreted. However,
one of the more significant signs within the film is that of the hawk. Conventionally
to a David Attenborough enthusiast for example, the hawk would signify connotations
such as predator
or swift. Yet within the context of the film, (as the hawk is set free at the
start) it signifies the freedom
and nurture
that the three children wish for themselves, whilst later changing (as it flies
home at the end) to signify that they all have now received their wishes
through Royal Tenenbaums metamorphosis
and somewhat unconventional plan to right his family. I.E. Sign= signified
(freedom/nurture) + signifier (hawk).
References:
Chandler, D. (2002.) Semiotics:
The Basics. 2nd edn. Oxon: Routledge.
Peirce, C. S. (1931-58) Elements
of Logic eds. Hartshorne, Charles. and Weiss, P. (8 Vols.) Cambridge, USA:
Harvard University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment if you'd like...