‘Thus one can really speak of two ‘modern’
cinemas, a silent cinema of Murnau, Dreyer, Lang, Bunuel, and Eisenstein and a
sound cinema which crystallizes in the 1960s and early 1970s.’ (Orr, 1993,
P.2.)
Modernism in film is hard to determine, as a
new movement in cinema has not really come about to change this classical system we
have come to know so well, and we are still living through it. Even
postmodernism can be seen to be just a rebellion against this system. As Orr
suggests, this art form is hardly even 100 years old (Orr, 1993.), and art
movements don’t always change this quickly. So for me I class the early period
of modern cinema as the real modernist cinema, as it was what pioneered how we
see film today. I studied early silent cinema last semester and already have
quite a good understanding of the history: like how the industrial revolution was happening at
the same time, and that really cinema and the film camera was a product of this
(just as modernist art was a reaction to this industrialisation). Filmmakers
like the Lumiere brothers and Eisenstein were pioneers in capturing this modernisation, yet I
think that soviet montage in particular stands out the most in this ‘modern
cinema’. Directors like Dziga Vertov and his film Man with a movie camera (1929) rebelled against the classical cinema system
that was arising and instead were working against such bourgeois (high society) conventions. As
Long and Wall suggest they wanted to shatter the ‘illusions’ and ‘ideologies’
of the dominating mainstream of Hollywood. They merged images and ideas
together, with their montage style editing, to create a new reality (Long and Wall, 2009.)
References:
Long, P. and Wall, T. (2009.) ‘Modernism, Postmodernism and
After’ in Media Studies: Texts,
Production and Context. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Man With a Movie Camera (1929.) Directed by Dziga Vertov
[Film.] Soviet Union: VUFKU
Orr, J. (1993.) Cinema
and Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment if you'd like...